
Bar Opposition Halts Plan for Ad Hoc High Court Judges, Says CJI
What Happened?
Chief Justice Surya Kant stated that opposition from bar associations has stalled the Supreme Court's efforts to appoint retired judges temporarily. This setback hampers attempts to address the significant backlog of cases.
Key points
- CJI Surya Kant mentioned that bar associations passed resolutions against appointing retired judges.
- The Supreme Court aimed to revive the practice of appointing ad hoc judges to reduce case backlog.
- Article 224A of the Constitution allows temporary reappointment of retired judges.
- Over 18 lakh criminal cases are currently pending in the Supreme Court.
- CJI recalled that two judicial officers resigned due to new pension rules.
Key insights
- The inability to appoint temporary judges may prolong the backlog crisis in the judicial system.
- Bar associations' resolutions reflect their influence on judicial appointments and practices.
- The new pension rules may discourage experienced judicial officers from serving in the courts.
Why it matters
The opposition from bar associations could significantly delay efforts to address the judicial backlog affecting many cases.
Tags
Entities
Source
India Today


