
Delhi High Court Grants Bail, Criticizes Police Inaction Over Hostile POCSO Witness
What Happened?
The Delhi High Court granted bail to a POCSO accused after the survivor denied all allegations, criticizing police for inaction regarding her allegedly false testimony.
Key points
- The High Court criticized police for showing 'total disinterest' in investigating the survivor's alleged false testimony.
- Justice Girish Kathpalia noted that the survivor completely denied the allegations during her testimony.
- The accused, a 37-year-old man, sought bail after the 16-year-old survivor turned hostile to the prosecution.
- The court highlighted that the prosecution failed to act against the survivor despite apparent perjury.
- The court emphasized the need for the criminal justice system to arrive at the truth based on evidence.
Key insights
- The court's criticism of police inaction may prompt a review of how hostile witnesses are handled in future cases.
- The case raises questions about the integrity of witness testimonies in POCSO cases, potentially affecting future prosecutions.
- The High Court's observations could lead to increased scrutiny of the prosecution's approach to hostile witnesses.
Why it matters
This case highlights issues of police accountability and the treatment of witnesses in the criminal justice system.
Source
India Today

