IndiaTop StoryTop StoryLatest News
'Process becomes punishment in our system': Ex-SC judge Sanjay Kaul on Umar Khalid, Sharjeel Imam bail pleas
Sentiment: NeutralHigh Priority
What Happened?
Former Supreme Court judge Sanjay Kaul criticized the prolonged custody before conviction, stating it acts as a punishment. He emphasized that bail should generally be the norm.
Key points
- Sanjay Kaul stated that the pre-conviction period acts as a punishment.
- He has generally taken a liberal view on bail.
- Kaul referred to concerns raised by several judges regarding prolonged custody.
- Khalid and Imam are accused under the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act.
- The Supreme Court denied bail to Khalid and Imam on January 5, 2026.
- The Delhi high court also rejected their bail pleas in September.
Key insights
- The prolonged custody could lead to calls for legal reforms in bail procedures.
- Judicial perspectives on bail may influence future court decisions.
- The case reflects broader concerns about the treatment of accused individuals in India.
Why it matters
This discussion highlights the ongoing issues in India's legal system regarding pre-conviction custody.
Entities
Sanjay Kishan Kaul· PersonUmar Khalid· PersonSharjeel Imam· PersonSupreme Court· OrganizationUnlawful Activities (Prevention) Act· LawDelhi· CityFebruary 2020 northeast Delhi riots· Event
Source
Times of India
