IndiaTop StoryTop StoryLatest News
'Too deferential to govt': Former SC judge questions ex-CJI Chandrachud’s approach to appointments
Sentiment: NeutralHigh Priority
What Happened?
Former Supreme Court judge Sanjay Kishan Kaul criticized ex-CJI D Y Chandrachud for being overly deferential to the government regarding judicial appointments, as revealed in his memoir.
Key points
- Justice Sanjay Kishan Kaul alleges Justice D Y Chandrachud was too deferential to the government in judicial appointments.
- Kaul's memoir, 'Without Fear or Favour', recounts a Collegium meeting where five candidates were pre-agreed.
- He expressed concern over discussing candidates with the government before formal Collegium meetings.
- Kaul stated that discussing judicial appointments with the government could undermine future Chief Justices.
- Congress raised concerns about judicial independence based on Kaul's revelations.
Key insights
- The allegations could lead to increased scrutiny of judicial appointments in India.
- If government influence is confirmed, it may erode public trust in the judiciary.
- The memoir may prompt discussions on reforming the judicial appointment process.
Why it matters
The discussion highlights concerns about judicial independence in India, particularly regarding government influence.
Tags
Entities
Sanjay Kishan Kaul· PersonD Y Chandrachud· PersonCongress· OrganizationSupreme Court· OrganizationPrevention of Money Laundering Act· LegislationIndia· Country
Source
Times of India
