GeneralBreaking NewsBreakingLatest News
Supreme Court Criticizes Centre Over Lack of Pedestrian Crossing Near Delhi HC
Sentiment: NeutralHigh Priority
What Happened?
The Supreme Court has criticized the Centre for not providing pedestrian crossings near the Delhi High Court, warning of protests if no action is taken. The court emphasized the need for better road infrastructure due to heavy foot traffic.
Key points
- The Supreme Court's two-judge bench includes Justice JB Pardiwala and Justice KV Viswanathan.
- Lawyers may protest if no pedestrian crossing is established by the next hearing.
- The court previously directed the Centre to identify a central authority for footpath provision.
- A senior advocate suggested the need for speed breakers and rumble strips near the crossing.
- The right to walk on a footpath is recognized as a fundamental right under Article 19(1)(d) of the Constitution.
Key insights
- Improving pedestrian infrastructure could enhance safety for court visitors.
- The Centre's response may set a precedent for future urban planning initiatives.
- Failure to act could lead to increased public protests, affecting government reputation.
Why it matters
The issue highlights the need for improved pedestrian safety measures in urban areas.
Source
Times Now
