
India Warns New UNSC Permanent Members Without Veto Would Be 'Second-Class'
What Happened?
India's UN Ambassador Parvathaneni Harish stated that any UNSC reform creating permanent members without veto powers would render them 'second-class'. He emphasized that all permanent members should have equal rights.
Key points
- India's position is that all permanent members of a reformed UNSC must have veto powers.
- Ambassador Harish warned that creating a new category of members without veto powers would not change the existing power dynamics.
- India has consistently advocated for expanding both permanent and non-permanent categories in the UNSC.
- The country is seeking a non-permanent seat for the 2028-29 term, competing against Tajikistan.
- Harish emphasized that the veto should be exercised with restraint, especially regarding international peace.
Key insights
- India's insistence on veto powers for all permanent members may reshape discussions on UNSC reform.
- The call for comprehensive reform reflects India's desire for a more equitable global governance structure.
- India's pursuit of a permanent seat indicates its growing influence in international politics.
Why it matters
India's stance on UNSC reform could influence future international governance and power dynamics.
Entities
Source
Times Now


